DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204
DIC
Docket No. 10776-12
6 Nov 12
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TOs Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/387 dtd 24 Oct 12
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to modify an immediate reenlistment contract.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
5 November 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 10776-12
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
a. The 6-year immediate reenlistment contract (NAVPERS
1070/601), executed on or about 30 March 2012 is modified to read
“Naval Reserve” vice “United States Navy", BR/CL “USNR” vice “USN",
and RADO MONTHS/DAYS “072/000", vice *900/000". The Enlistment Master
File (EMF) should reflect BRCL “32”, SPI-TAR “V", TAR-TEMAC “Y", EAOS
“29 March 2018”, SEAOS “29 March 2018", RADOMO “072", and EREN
“29 March 2018”.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BARBARA A. NAHULAK
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
6 Nov 12 oy
Executive Director
Acting
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09081 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DIC Docket No. 9081-12 1 Nov 12 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Bor Secretary of the Navy Subj: — OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) ‘Title 10 U.S.¢. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1235-13
NR1235-13 12 Mar 13 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO_ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10840 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08329 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DJC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6912-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11182 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6899 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The 5 year immediate reenlistment contract (NAVPERS 1070/601), executed "United States Navy" on or about 30 April 2013, is null and void.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6698 14
Pursuant to-the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of qe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01811-12
1811-12 14 Feb 12 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tei: Secretary of the Navy Subj}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR3002 15
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 ts Mey Cae” Sire JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of a Fg ad i tions o reviewed Petitioner's allega error and injustice on 20 April...